find out all right welcome everybody
welcome back from lunch we are here just
so you're sure you're in the right spot
we're going to talk about from feedback
to finish how to leverage using photo
scripts for website design so let's get
into it so really I guess what I wanted
to emphasize other than just reading
through this agenda is that I really
want this to be its interactive as you
folks want it to be this is really a
very personal slash anecdotal but I
think useful for other people too but I
do want to say that this is a very
specific use case study so if you find
that it's not useful for you like 10
minutes into this feel free to go
perception and still be fine but if
you've got questions as we're going
through I did reserve some time at the
end for Q&A please feel free to pop up
with questions in the meantime as I said
this is a pretty specific use case but I
do think that there are some lessons
learned that can be abstracted to other
perhaps smaller efforts as well I also
wanted to mention if you folks haven't
noticed there's also a UX session
tomorrow a camera if it's in the
afternoon or not which might be
complementary to this I'm talking about
smaller scale user focus groups and UX
design experiences so a little bit of
background on me my name is Kelly
Chatterton I'm director of web
experience at Cleary
Partners a little bit about me and a
little bit about clarity I've been in
this space for over 20 years at this
point
I remember when mosaic came out that
people really exciting very very cool I
worked with lots and lots of different
platforms I've done some custom
development but mostly working with
different content management systems and
I've also worn lots and lots of
different
that's so I've been a developer although
honestly at this point that was a long
time ago I've been in QA I've done
helpdesk I've been the pointing your
manager for a while so I'm telling you
this because I have seen heard like the
lots of clients clarity partners has
lots and lots of clients but I did want
to emphasize that Clary partners
primarily works with government public
sector clients and if you haven't worked
with those before they do have their own
set of challenges
they tend to move at a slightly
different pace and say private sector my
private sector clients always want
everything done yesterday or last week
if at all possible nobody comes in the
private sector nobody comes to you and
says you know what thinking about maybe
making a website and maybe in a year or
two we'll do it we just want to talk
about it right now
that's totally what the public sector
clients want to do they want to spend a
lot of time for new things out before
him again I'm telling you this because
the rhythm of this particular case study
project that we're going to talk about
might not be the rhythm of the projects
that you're working with on a day to day
basis so your mileage will definitely
vary here Park District's so the client
that we're going to talk about is
Chicago Park District Park District has
been a client of Clarys for they think
six or seven years at this point the
folks at Park District's that I've
worked with I've probably worked with
them for close to 15 years because I
work with them and in another capacity
as well but a little bit of Park
District's background as an organization
tons of green space obviously tons of
parks many of those parks are along the
lakefront Chicago gets a lot of things
wrong but they really did a great job
a public space especially after the fire
but well almost more importantly at
these parks and facilities they're
offering thousands literally thousands
of programs and events every year just a
side note if you live in the city of
Chicago and you're not using what the
park district has to offer you're really
missing out especially especially if you
have little kids there's tons of stuff
to do with kids at the protesters so
they have a lot of content tons of
content and whereas you might think that
there's not a lot of content with a park
that changes all that much the opposite
is true they're changing their hours all
the time they've got different events
different programs things might be under
construction
it's information they have to let
everybody know and by everybody I mean
everybody they're really trying to serve
the entire metropolitan community of
Chicago across all the different ages
ethnicities North versus South they're
trying to do it all and they have to try
and communicate that primarily through
their website and their website does
take a lot of traffic the page views
were very tremendously there are some
days where they're only half a dozen
hits and some days where they're going
to have 500,000 those are spikes that
are really driven seasonally so for
instance what is today today is the 9th
probably two weeks ago probably one of
their most popular pages would have been
their ice rinks page this is you know
the end of winter everybody wants to get
out there I'm starting at about you know
a month or so the beaches pages and
swimming pools pages are going to become
very very popular so I'm telling you
this in part because you can't just
optimize one area of the site if the
whole site has to be really responsive
because depending on what time of year
it is they're going to get hit having
said that there are some pretty standard
pop
pages regardless of the season programs
parks events and jobs so there are a few
areas that we could focus on yeah so
what prompted a change we launched a new
version of the site at the end of 2017
took us about a year from start to
finish to get that sucker out there and
done but why do the move the biggest
issue was that the old platform and this
is a screenshot of the old homepage the
old platform excuse me was on an old
customized proprietary system and there
was nothing wrong with that system to
begin with I just want to be clear about
that but it had probably been customized
over the course of five or six years
four years maybe because of client
requests in other words kind of the Park
District said yes this is you know a
great page that we want mystery care
this tweak there so by the time Park
District was looking at replac forming
there was almost no one who understood
the codebase of this site so they really
needed to get on to something that was
stable and usable and you know could be
maintained because the old site was
really a case of you would make an
enhancement over here it's something
over here any website would break the
other issue in terms of moving was that
because this site had been built again
several years ago I think it was
originally built five or six years ago
and then they refactored the design to
be responsive three years after that
refactored meaning there were some major
pages in the site like the home page
that was made responsive but then there
were some interior pages where they just
kind of went yeah we'll do the best we
can but we're not going to rip out the
program so we did need to make it
responsive through and
so the goal was to replac form the goal
was not to do significant redesign
however it's really hard not to do that
and really hard not to take advantage of
a project like this so we did end up
doing some redesign which we hadn't
intended at the beginning so where were
we starting from we had a lot of data
Park District I think at this point has
probably over a decade worth of Google
Analytics if they really wanted to dig
back into it so we had Google Analytics
we knew what pages were getting hit they
had done some quick Google user surveys
but just like the standard widget so you
get to ask like a few generic questions
so now a lot can we you know that we did
do some significant benchmark and
comparison analysis and that's the
screenshot of what you're seeing here
which is much longer and much wider
Excel spreadsheet that we created based
on probably I think it was a six or
seven major comparable parks and then
probably another dozen websites that the
part district folks were interested in
basically to see what functions did they
have
what were the labeling things this was
turned into a really big deal when we're
going through this process were they
calling it apart were they calling it an
activity were they calling an event so
we had all of that so we did have a lot
of information to start with but it
wasn't really enough data only really
takes you so far because you can say
well this page always gets hit and then
this page likes a photo galleries never
gets hit but if you're just looking at
the Google Analytics you don't know why
is it because people are not interested
in throat o Galilee's or is it because
they can't find them this turned into a
whole series of conversations where
everybody's staring at the sink data and
guessing about what it meant so what you
really needed to do is find out how
people are really using it in terms of
finding out how people are really using
it it's also sometimes better and it
certainly was in this case to get
external validation because even though
practiced retired clarity partners for
our expertise at a certain point when
you're having these arguments you'll
you'll inevitably have conversations
like well you just don't know where
users the way that we know we're users
so there you know you get into these
situations we can't really resolve the
conflict a bonus for perk districts and
other organizations that we've worked
with
it's the publicity of using a focus
group if I'm doing a major project and
I'm a private company I can spend my
money how I want if I'm doing a major
project and I'm a public government
organization and it's a lot of taxpayer
money that's being spent you better have
a good justification for what the
outcomes are so they also had the
advantage of using the focus group to
say hey we reached out to actual Chicago
residents we got their feedback and we
incorporated it but the goal ultimately
using a focus group is find out how
people are using the site so this is
where a confessed that we had a secret
weapon then not everybody can use a lot
of people can which is part of why I
want to have this slide up here but we
were using smart Chicago that
organization excuse me made a major
change at the end of December of last
year and they were now known as City
tech but they exist their whole mission
is to improve lives in Chicago through
technology and the real secret sauce is
they already have a built-in audience of
testers
their civic user testing group pep group
look gorg will tell you all about their
methodology but the key here is they've
got literally thousands people already
signed up willing to test technology
projects that are put in front of them
so we've worked with them before on a
couple of other projects and again I
know not everybody can use an
organization like this which is what I'm
gonna talk about some alternative
options later so here's I want to get
into the nitty-gritty of what to expect
and what we went through
so park district clarity smart Chicago
Mets we clarify their goals what are we
trying to do and the goals really came
down to power people using the old
existing site how are they getting
information what's working what isn't
working so the first thing to figure out
is who do you want to test this is
important regardless it might seem like
an obvious thing but cast your mind back
to a few minutes ago part of the reason
that we were doing the testing with the
user focus group is we had these you
know Clash of the Titans arguments about
well why are people doing this you do
not want to invalidate your user focus
group by getting the wrong set of
testers so for instance I have been
happy to test I have been happy to be a
tester for this but I live in Evanston I
don't use the perk district resources I
don't use their program from their vents
you don't want people that that are
doing the testing that the client can
then come back and say well who cares
what Kelly thought I mean she's not a
resident so you get think about who it
is that you want to test in our case we
wanted to get people from Chicago
she had to be Chicago resident and then
they wanted a mix they wanted a mix of
people how to use the website and your
hadn't so they were getting a
cross-section people who had and had
participated in their events and
families and seagulls really getting a
across demographic the next item was
developing the questions which you would
think would be really straightforward
and simple and it wasn't you know but
the idea is to find out what are the
pain points of the website how can
people find information is it easy you
know giving some specific task oriented
questions but it took us a while to come
up with those questions but then what we
found out is once the first we had a
shared Google spreadsheet that we had
when we were starting to draft the
questions and once we had the first five
or six questions the floodgates opened
like oh my god there's this thing I've
been wanting to ask people for years now
I have a chance we ended up with way too
many we have over 50 questions and there
were 50 questions that we all cared
passionately about and Sonia who was our
main contact at smart Chicago was very
diplomatic and very gentle and basically
said no way you can't ask this many
questions
I think her original target was to get
us down to five or six so it became this
part of the process for us actually
became the most painful because we were
already invested in those 50 questions
that we'd come up with so to then go I'd
have to like kill your children down to
five or six was really hard so the other
thing that I thought would be useful to
share in terms of trying to figure out
how to eliminate questions is what makes
a bad question and basically they fell
into three categories there were some
questions that were too big one of the
questions we originally had was why
would you visit chicagoparkdistrict.com
what are you looking for when that
question just smells of desperation you
know I mean it doesn't really give
people a focus to hang
- we also have a question what is your
opinion of the photo usage on the site
which images are informative and which
are merely decorative that's try asking
somebody to solve an internal argument I
mean that's so clearly me arguing with
Aaron about our marketing photos you
can't ask somebody to answer that for
you some of our questions were too
narrow what incentives do you look for
before participating in a loyalty your
points reward program how would you go
about contacting a local park advisory
council those are actually legitimate
questions but if we're trying to have a
focus group that's solving the most
problems for the most people this these
are not it I mean especially if we're
trying to get down to a smaller set of
questions and then finally we have some
questions they weren't really solving a
problem how would you find and apply for
a job well if you remember the jobs page
is one of the highest hit pages in the
site already people are obviously
finding that likewise how would you
register as a vendor if you wanted to do
business with Park District I can
guarantee you that if we buried that
page seven levels deep with no
navigation access to it the people who
want to do business with practice are
going to find those pages anyway so
those weren't really solving a problem
so what makes a good question ultimately
we narrowed it down puts a fewer than
ten which again was really really hard
for us but they were task oriented they
were task oriented and specific and
trying to be as close to something that
people would use as possible one of the
things that we ended up doing is the
focus group ended up being in
excuse me one of the local libraries so
one of our questions was search for
Chicago Park that's closest to this
library find the hours for an indoor
pool closest to you and then we decided
to throw in a few sort of trivia hunting
questions like finding out the year the
Buckingham Fountain was installed I do
have the URL for the final report here
excuse me
and after mid camps over and we upload
the PDFs to the site you can grab that
one of the which I should have said
before one of the mandates for smart
Chicago is they are happy to work with
different organizations but one of their
requirements is they have to be
completely transparent so if you go to
that report you will see all the
questions we used the summary report
that is smart Chicago provided and then
the final full report so if you want to
see all the questions in there sort of
as a good guideline so what was the
process like scheduling was slow from
our initial discussions to actually
doing the test itself was about six
weeks and then I think it was probably
two weeks after that for the summary
reports come through I'm mentioning this
because if you're thinking about doing a
user focus group and at least a user
focus group that's giving you feedback
on an old existing site the idea is
you're going to use that to inform how
you're going to build the new site so if
you're going to get the results back it
still has to be in the discovery process
of your project otherwise it's no good
in other words it doesn't do you any
good or it doesn't you belong money I
suppose but normally it doesn't do you
any good to get this sort of feedback if
you're already full month into
development because if there's anything
that comes back that says oh the
navigation that we thought it was
fantastic is new
for anybody are you gonna throw away
that month worth of development start
over you're just gonna say well I guess
sucks to be a user of our website and
again you can scale these things as
large or small as as you want to which
again I'll talk about a little bit but
do know that there's you know some
effort that you've got a plan for
initially so there's the you know the
usual like one is everybody available
there's also in terms of scheduling the
actual focus group itself just the
stupid physical space like where are you
gonna be we ended up having I think
ultimately we had a couple dozen people
do our testing we have more respond but
the day of I think it was a couple dozen
so we have space for that and then
equipment it's just a question right I
mean are you asking people to bring
their laptops or are you providing
laptops for them you just need to plan
it out in advance there is then also the
issue of getting the people getting the
participants so there's the time lag
that you'll need if you're sort of
sending out emails and scheduling with
people that you don't know which was the
case here there's also getting people to
help you Proctor the test itself we
ended up having the settle later slide
we we ended up having five smart Chicago
staff and then five other folks either
from clarity what from Chicago Park
District to help us with this which I
will tell you at the time I said well
it's a lot of people it was barely
enough for the testing that we did so
you'll need to make sure that you're
getting enough people to help you again
depending on the scale of what you're
doing
crucial here is this is all possible to
get a client representative to be part
that test with you so much better we've
done this a few times we've had a client
be with us and also the situation where
the client wasn't with us you can
summarize your findings you can provide
a report and I will tell you that if
you're providing report dry or not dry
depending on your talents the writing
this and your report says navigation and
the site is really difficult for people
with visual disabilities and here's
where it's particularly problematic that
is not anything is impactful as having a
client sit down with a woman who's
visually disabled and asked her to find
a park and listening to her difficulties
and having to heard having to repeat
over and over and over in searches which
was an experience that we had and I will
tell you about twenty minutes into that
I think Aaron was ready to burn down
this site and just say you don't have a
website we're running away this is too
awful so if you can get a client to
being part of the focus group it's huge
because they'll have an emotional
response that they won't have otherwise
so the next thing we did is you know so
we've got our time schedule we've got
our testers we figured out the logistics
for these these things and then smart
Chicago said okay we need to have you
guys come in we're gonna help run this
test and we'll do a review of the
procedures now at this point I was happy
to do it
I did have a little bit of an internal
iral I'm like what this movie's
straightforward I don't think we need to
do this thank goodness we did first of
all going through the review of the
procedures for the actual tests I think
put the rest of us at ease
just going through and saying okay we're
gonna have 28 people come through that's
how many confirm but again I think we
only had a couple dozen everybody's
gonna have roughly at 30 to 45 minutes
slot it's over this you know three and a
half hour time so we sort of a constant
rolling through of people when someone
comes in last them to sign a form we'll
sit down with them we'll assign two
people to be with them and by the time
Stoney had run through that I was like
okay
I get it that seems good and then what
she did with which I thought was really
smart as she explained okay this is how
you're gonna run through the test you're
gonna ask your users to stay out loud
all the time what it is that they're
doing you're gonna be capturing what it
is that they're doing but at the same
time you the proctor of the test should
really be keeping in mind what you think
the user is doing that they haven't sent
out loud so you can make your notes
later on so you're you are being asked
to do sort of a a double think while
you're doing this if you're a proctor so
we're like okay yeah yeah yeah yeah and
then she had his pair off with each
other and run through a few questions
which was highly revealing because I
realized wait okay I'm typing at the
same time that I'm listening to what
this user is going through this is
really hard
so prepping for the test even if it's
just a few minutes to go through how are
you going to ask these questions really
really useful so the test itself did
give us some surprises that I wasn't
expecting and this is sort of again what
I thought would be useful to share with
other people physical space matters so
we had a nice room
a local library is about this size with
lots and tables and chairs
I think our tests ran from 4:00 in the
afternoon to 7:30 something like that
which was great in the sense that you
know it's fairly convenient for people
who are getting off work and kind of
crappy in the sense that most of the
people who are coming to the library ran
into traffic issues because we were
asking them to come basically during
rush hour so what it meant was our plan
we had everybody designated with you
have this 30 minutes line you have this
missing their appointments and stacking
up so we thought we had plenty of space
and we kind of didn't at the end of the
day the other thing that we ran into
where physical space matters a lot is we
stressed the hell out of that library's
Wi-Fi we hadn't really thought ahead by
having all these people because you know
the testers are on laptops or phones
whatever we provided and then the
proctors are also on laptops or phones
trying to take notes and there were a
few times where you sort of have this
ripple go through the room with like
five so physical space matters again
just keep it in mind when you're
planning your own testing so we had
these 30 to 45 minutes lapse which again
I thought in my head like 10 questions
come on under way too much time I don't
know that any of our tests actually
squeezed in two minutes the one test
that I've already mentioned that I was
doing with with one of the testers who
was visually disabled I think we were
with her for almost an hour
running through those questions so give
yourself enough time it's going to take
more time than you think in part cuz
people get really really invested in
these tests the other thing is even
though this test we're taking so long
we're taking notes the whole time really
trying to keep up we could barely keep
up because again people are invested in
really trying to do their best to tell
us everything that they were doing the
it was just awful they're revealing
sitting with Maureen for over an hour
really made me invested in missions sure
that the new site was in better shape
one thing that may or may not again your
mileage will vary that we found was
really frustrating for everybody
involved is the users got confused over
different sites our mandate was to find
out how are people using dub dub dub -
time apart district common not
surprisingly Park District has all kinds
of other external sites that the dub dub
dub site links to it wasn't we didn't
really care about the purpose of our
test but if the user is going off on the
park point site and spending 20 minutes
there or going off on the registration
site and spending twenty minutes there
it was really hard to just explain to
the user no go back to where we were
before because again you don't want to
direct that much of the users experience
it was also really really hard not to
help the people that were testing I mean
we had these task oriented questions
they were kind of set up like a
scavenger hunts in a lot of ways so we
knew where people could go to find out
what your Buckingham Fountain was
installed we knew where people could go
to find out the indoor pool closest to
them it was really hard as usually we're
fumbling through not to say
thank you what made this especially
difficult is we had talked about in our
preparation for the test we talked about
you know if users get stuck it's okay
you know they don't have to find the
answers to these questions because our
interest is just in their experience of
trying to get there what none of us had
really banked on was the people who were
testing really didn't want to be wrong
you really really wanted to find the
answers to these questions so even
though we would say it's okay you don't
have to find an answer it was I don't
know I really want to find miss Doane
Park which also made you know the tests
go a little bit long but users being
sensitive to being wrong was just
something we were not expecting or
prepared for all right so let's talk
about outcomes so as I mentioned we had
the test like all those people come
through they were great it gave us a lot
of good feedback and about two weeks
later we got the summary report back
from smart Chicago it answered a lot of
our questions and also gave us the
ammunition to make some changes so you
will see excuse me
another screenshot from the old homepage
on the left you'll notice I mean there's
not a lot of changing information that
you'll notice on that left-hand
screenshot there is a lot to look out
there
you know one of the questions that we
had for our testers was you come to the
home page what is it that you want to do
so Sonya when she was providing the
summer and report back to us again very
diplomatic
very gently when she was going through
the percentages of what people were
doing she said I have never seen as
fractured a set of results as what you
guys got when I'm asking people to go to
a home page you know some people
I clicked on the big green banner some
people are happily looking at the things
next to the hero image that we're going
to the news it was just all over the
place
we had already been arguing suggesting
strenuously to Park District that they
really needed to clean up their homepage
they really needed to give people more
of a focus on what to do
and so the user focus group results
really allowed us to push that argument
further and say you really really want
to clean homepage yeah I will jump ahead
a little bit to the end and say surprise
surprise this argument is not over
because once we launched the site some
of the feedback we got was well it's too
plain the homepage is too plain we need
to move things up we need to have more
things around here so the real estate
battle continues but at least initially
we did get to clean up the homepage for
them that was directly out of the user
focus group results the other thing that
came up very very clearly out of the
focus group was you guys got a focus on
mobile I mentioned before that the old
version of the site had optimized some
pages but not all of them you will see
in particular this notice retracted on
the search page on the old site was
really really cluttered and almost
unusable on a phone so we were able to
focus on mobile streamline searching so
this is where it's talking about is the
screenshot on the left which is the
whole site but just kind of gave up on a
mobile device there wasn't much you
could do there so instead of having it's
a little bit hard to see but instead of
having
you know all these different options and
dropdowns that would expand the feedback
that we got really clearly from the
focus group is you got to make the
searching simpler so we collapsed
basically the the options that people
had
based on that feedback highlighting the
mapping options so this was interesting
again it's a little bit hard to tell
with the old screenshot on the left but
there are these tabs indicators that
second tab is a link to a map of where
all the swimming pools are no one ever
saw that and we were gonna play through
that the user focus group they never saw
when we're asking for map or geographic
related questions that there was even an
option to go to a map so one of the
things that we did with the redesign is
really make the mapping option front and
center for people so you really couldn't
miss it so all that's great what if you
don't have an established Civic user
testing group available you can still do
your own focus group you really can so
these first few bullet points that I
have here clarify your goals develop
your questions we didn't need cut
briefly at certainly not for clarifying
our goals and developing our questions
we really just needed somebody to say
you can't do a user focus group of 50
questions I'm telling you now focus
group with 50 questions just pare them
down develop them as pare them down
and focus find neutral testers that
doesn't have to be you know going out to
residents of the city of Chicago we have
done user focus groups where it's it's
literally five other people in the
office now they're still fitting the
demographic that we're looking for for
the particular project and I'm thinking
of their worst acog o residents they
weren't in any way shape or form related
to the client or the project that we
were working on and but they were you
know available they're invested and any
testing is better than none this is an
old an old particle link from the
Nielson group but it's still really
valid which is five is usually enough
you know we have the luxury of having a
couple dozen testers it gave us the
luxury of having a really broad across
demographic section of people but if
you've got five people testing you're
probably gonna get and this isn't like a
real stat this is just my anecdotal stat
you're probably gonna get like 80% of
what you need from five people after
that you know you're getting little
cherries on top but after after five you
got most of what you need the incentives
don't have to be that big cut group if
I'm recalling correctly they give their
users a five dollar Visa gift card to
sign up to make themselves available and
then for participating in a testing I
think it was a 25 dollar Visa gift card
so it's not overwhelming in terms of you
know what your ultimate project budget
is gonna be and then finally just spend
a little time prepping for the test you
know there's going to be probably less
prep that you would have to do if you
don't have as many users and you don't
have as many logistical difficulties but
you know grab some
and just test one through the questions
for five minutes 15 minutes you'll
inevitably find a way that question
sounds kind of stupid now but I'm saying
about or oh wait this is actually gonna
take my user longer to figure this out
so I need to buffer some time so as long
as you prep for the test you should be
good so what's next for us I'm hoping
and what in discussion with city tech
now I'm hoping that we can go back and
basically run the same test with a
different set of users to basically
validate did we solve our pain points
you know if we're looking for a redesign
Reap lat form in order to get users to
information more readily more quickly
did we do that or are we seeing the same
issues over and over again we haven't
planned that out but we're hoping to the
other reason other than just validating
our pain points which I've already
alluded to before is we're still
fighting about real estate we're still
fighting about well why aren't we having
the news more comment on the home page
why don't we have 5 more items in the
IRL navigation because everybody wants
their piece of that home page or their
piece of that navigation and when we're
coming across these conversations and
we've come across quite a few of them at
this point we're still having this Clash
of the Titans things where okay we need
to get some users to validate this so
the other thing that I would leave you
with is this isn't necessarily like us
with so many things with websites this
isn't necessarily a one and done kind of
thing it may be you know something
I want to do periodically again I can
say that a little bit of a luxury with
Chicago Park District that's something
that that client is invested into they
want to get user feedback they want to
know how people are using their site
again that that will vary per per client
all right I ran through that like an
auctioneer I'm afraid that I wasn't
intending to but any questions yes do
you ask customers to bring their own
devices and not you
she's the browser or how much materials
so for the tests that we did with
Charlotte Park District we provided that
we snatch Chicago provided laptops and
iPads particularly with the disabled
testers that we had iPads with it's
voice over but some you know built-in
recognitions the other thing I should
take to is part of the reason that smart
Chicago was providing their laptops as
they already had built-in screen
recording devices screen recording
software so it wasn't just should've
said recently it wasn't just the proctor
scrambling writing their notes when they
were developing their report later they
were also able to see the recordings and
what people were doing solids were
different we did ask people to bring
their own phones if that's the device
that was being tested but that was
determined ahead of time so for instance
when the smart I were sending out their
questionnaire there's there basically
ask me would you be willing to bring
your phone to test and if they said yes
then it's much cago it said okay here's
your time slot that you're coming on
Tuesday afternoon would you please bring
your phone there's even a divorce and
exhaustion in other much smaller
settings have we done we just asked
people to bring their stuff
did you use a camera or something to
record the phone with tests no we didn't
have any recordings for the phone test
if I recall correctly so that was a
missing piece for that for sure so in a
case like this you know you'd ask
somebody a question about Buckingham
Fountain yeah you're gonna get data back
either it's easy to find or it's
difficult to find on the site like this
where there's tens of thousands or
hundreds of thousands of bits of
information rather than like we do in
your entire you know how does this play
into not everything could be on home
page so you could have a good navigation
structure give it a good search
structure but how does that one little
piece help you so that that one little
piece actually helped in a couple
different ways one it was and it was it
was a prototypical example question
right one was how are people even trying
to find the information okay so are they
even starting from a point of I'm gonna
use the navigation or are they starting
from a point of gonna use a search so
there were several questions that were
like that which is like it is navigation
even an element in somebody trying to
find this the other thing which was an
unexpected outcome for some of these
questions and that one in particular was
we discovered that Park District wasn't
keeping kosher with its content and
they're actually at least two and I
think three different pages on the site
about Buckingham Fountain that had
slightly different information on than
those pages so that was an unexpected
outcome basically my back to part two
servings of stop stop doing this madness
thing that you're doing but it was
really that first item that I mentioned
it wasn't more important which is how
are you been trying to get there so for
instance just to close the loop if
you've got
people who are in charge of special
artworks or special elements that Park
District owns that are saying like I
want you know Buckingham Fountain to be
under the drop-down under you know parks
you say listen people aren't even
starting there so you're just taking a
very valuable real estate when you don't
need to
we rely on some logic hago entirely for
that reporting and their mandate was as
many very system very clear as an
organization all the way through that
everything is completely transparent so
in addition to the URL that I provided
before with that sort of main page there
are the questions that we use the
totally wrong results from the testers
and Proctor's I should also say when the
the testers and Proctor's are recording
their notes the testers get to use
whatever
thank you many want you know so what
you're seeing in that report is you know
user Red Dog 2020 as this response is
still anonymous in that sense and then
smart Chicago took that totally raw data
they went back and layered their
analysis on top of it provided that
summary report to both cleared and Park
District and then they clean it up as a
final report that is also public on the
site it was great to have smart again as
another advantage of using an
organization like that it's ready to
have them do the summary report because
then you can honestly say that this is
an organization that has no investments
in these design arguments that we've
already been having for eight weeks so
it really again gave that income on tour
of neutrality to it
the first is he mentioned
through ours
they only say
really both both so we talked about this
before and I forgot to do it
let me repeat your question so the
question was as users are being asked to
say out loud are they saying what
they're doing but also are they saying
what they're expecting and if any
implicitly are we recording matter yes
yes and yes so those part of the
scramble right is when we're asking
somebody to find Buckingham Fountain and
they're typing in to the search bar and
they're frustrated with the results that
are coming back you as the proctor
saying okay well they went straight to
the search bar they didn't try to do the
navigation at all they just went to the
straight to the search bar they're
saying they're frustrated they're saying
what they're expecting and you're trying
to record this I will say that again as
part of the preparation process that
Sonya put us through and we realize even
then that it was hard to keep up she's
like don't try and write complete
sentences don't want time for that just
write something that is sensical enough
that you can come back and understand
generally what the user was trying to do
and to actually you know verbalize what
they're feeling
they're inexperienced or there
and maybe shy about it or they're not
sure which
how are you could sound like they were
really talking about so how are you they
were but you're right so that so the
question that you're asking is how do
you get users to verbalize what it is
that they're doing or trying to do if
they're not inclined to verbalize that
that was also part of the preparation we
did which is Sonia was asking us to ask
questions but it was also you're right
it's hard not to ask questions without
being leading but I think that was part
of the advantage of having really task
oriented items for them to begin with
because what we were they what we were
asking them to do was already fairly
neutral you know finally near the
Buckingham Fountain is installed there's
nobody's invested in that really well if
if we got a user that was and this is a
strongly an example but if we got a user
that was silently going through a couple
of navigation items and then going to
the search at that point you know I
would intervene not intervene but say
out loud why did you decide to go to the
search at that point and then get her to
say what thought it was gonna be here I
was gonna be here and it kind of gave up
we were just meant to search I have done
focus groups that have had the pitfall
that you were just talking about we did
a focus group with another clients a
year and a half ago and part of what
we're trying to do with that focus group
was the client already had a website and
they were internally trying to decide if
they wanted to have a website or mobile
app and unfortunately my boss came along
through that focus group and he's a
great guy by the way I just to be clear
but he was so impatient
we were like 15 minutes into this and it
just lunged in because like if you had a
mobile app for this because then you
could do XYZ
and honestly like half the room was like
no we don't want to a mobile app and
then he went into a sales pitch I'm
Gerald and I were sitting there going
well okay so much for this focus group
seven test results we try again with the
next group but yeah that fix that you
don't want to be leading at all possible
yes
what
what time since it is a very Jewish
website where there are no people of all
kinds choosing this what kind of
demographics did you specify by choosing
this because you know when you talk of a
person with disabilities or something
like that that kind of user doesn't come
across thank you
so we kept it pretty broad so the
question was what kinds of users did we
specify for this we kept it pretty broad
in part to be honest with you to take
advantage of the pool that smart Chicago
has meaning smart Chicago has done a lot
of effort and outreach over the years to
get an ethnically diverse set of users
they don't have the diversity that
they're looking for so we didn't we
talked about we didn't want to throw
that in as part of the mix because they
were afraid we weren't actually going to
get that many users back what we were
comfortable throwing in as part of the
mix is getting users from different
parts of the state so we did ask we we
just asked like what their zip codes
were people know they already had that
when when you sign up you have to tell
that so we did tell us much Chicago has
it for instance we don't want everybody
from the north side you know we gotta
get sort of a range of people we also
asked for not an age demographic but
were you single or did you have a thing
because the other thing that Park
District cares a lot about is serving
kids so we wanted to make sure that we
had people who were if they were already
interested they would be interested in
signing their kids up for programs and
that's really kind of broadly where
we've stayed
we didn't go deeper with that did you
analyze the demographics afterwards they
did so you'll see in me well again with
I constantly think yes we did within
that really kind of broad set of buckets
yes smart card oh did that analysis for
us so and that is part of the summary
report that they have available to be
honest with you and they don't know to
be pre fractured there wasn't there
wasn't a clear indicator that if you
were you know a parent or not a parent
you've got to fucking completely Foster
honestly the only difference was if you
if you were a parent with kids you are
doing how to register for the programs
but that was kind of it in terms of the
demographic usefulness they've got out
of it
you can forgive her this this group that
you have private esters that yours a
minimum sort of technical skill amongst
the testers I mean ah who didn't so that
the question was was there a minimal set
of tech savviness skills among the
testers I am trying to honestly remember
I don't think that that was a specific
question that we asked but I think that
it it's a self-selecting group because
smart Chicago again there their mission
is all about using technology to make
life better in the city of Chicago
so these testers are always testing
something that's technical it's not
necessarily website could be napped
could be something else so if you're
willing to sign up for that you're again
you're already self-selecting to a
certain extent which is good and I park
districts as you may or may not be aware
has these seasonal registrations four
times a year in the Park District staff
sets up a temporary call center which
I'm part of and so I'm there answering
questions and again if you haven't
experienced that these registration
periods are insane it's like a nine
o'clock on a Monday morning all over the
city parents are poor days they've got
multiple browsers multiple computers
going to like sign up their kids but you
get these calls and they're kind of I
don't know surprising but also
refreshing I just did this a couple
weeks ago and the woman that I was
talking to didn't understand that a
highlighted text was a hyperlink that
you
we don't get those people coming to our
test but they're obviously still have
their engine is detailing for were you
then able to use hindsight to look back
at the Google Analytics and find that
maybe Diller indicators of some of these
findings already I mean so the question
was having gotten the summary report
will be able to tie that back to the
Google Analytics fundamentals but no I
mean I can confidently say no we didn't
do that but I'm trying to think if any
of the questions that we had could have
tied back to that I'm not sure that
could have so again the buckingham Park
example we could certainly have seen
well how many pages how many times at
the Buckingham Park page ends plural
being hit how many times is Buckingham
Park being used as a search term but
that didn't give us the insight that we
got during a test of people didn't even
try and go through navigation they just
went straight to the search term so we
still it's still a different set of data
at least at least for this experience
yeah I think your point is well-taken
which is in a different instance you
could do exactly that
just not for us any other questions
more questions the intercom plenty of
the reports it just could you talk a
little bit more in general about how you
make certainly choose the large amount
of data that's because I haven't been
involved in project leaders have all
these notes from user testing so so the
question was you're getting this
information back from the user testing
and I would expand that actually to get
all this information from the analytics
and the benchmarking that you're
starting up with - how do you make sure
that you get it used broadly not all of
it was used it just wasn't in the report
so in it in the presentation that I had
I mentioned we've seen a four major
outcomes that we serve clicked onto the
report itself had if memory serves
something like ten like specific
findings once we got past those first
four they were either fights that I
wasn't willing to take on because I
wanted to get the project launched or
they weren't important enough to really
make an impact but that was true for
those other things too meaning we did
this benchmarking which is a pretty
extensive process and probably
especially comparing other Park
District's and what they were doing
and I think probably out of that I'm
trying to remember Katie anything is
like a 50 page report I think out of
that there were probably only three or
four findings out of that that really
made their way into the final redesign
week platform but that's okay you know I
mean not everything is gonna get in
there you can't win every battle I think
it's okay if you do
these efforts these focus groups this
you know research and even if just one
or two gets back in I so called a win
making decisions with data is thoughtful
reasoning always alright